For internal HR teams (SMB/mid-market)
Based on 4 real customer demos

HubSpot for recruitment, really?

« HubSpot too generic, poorly suited to recruitment specifics. » — Asterigo. « Agency » ATSes (Tool for Staffing) aren't built for 5-8 people internally. Marvin combines ATS + CRM for SMB/mid-market HR teams: differentiated licenses (full HR + consultative managers), OPCO Qualiopi training, replaces HR HubSpot. Out of scope: sovereignty-strict large accounts (Cloud Act).

licences différenciées

HR + managers

OPCO Qualiopi

reimbursable

remplace HubSpot RH

savings offset cost

Today's reality

What we hear in demos with SMB/mid-market HR teams.

Sales CRM unsuited for recruitment

« HubSpot used by BU heads, considered too generic and poorly suited to recruitment specifics. » — Asterigo. You pay a sales CRM that knows nothing about a candidate pipeline.

« Agency » tools poorly used internally

« Tool for Staffing: single license, blocking 8 people from candidate visibility. Interface poorly suited for internal collaborative use, more designed for agencies. » — Asterigo.

Managers not entering their interview notes

« Ability for managers to enter interview notes directly on the candidate profile, without email back-and-forth with HR. » — Asterigo need.

Tight budgets, C-Level approval

« €5,000/year would already be too high for 7 full licenses. » — Asterigo. Without flexible license model, you're off-market.

How Marvin speeds it up

An HR stack that fits the budget and collaboration.

1

Differentiated HR + manager licenses

Full licenses for HR (1-2 people), consultative or limited-entry licenses for managers (4-6 people). You stay in budget while giving access to all recruitment stakeholders.

2

Direct sourcing + application reception in one tool

Direct LinkedIn approach (1-click extension) AND reception of applications from postings (90+ job boards multi-posting), centralized in Marvin.

3

Managers enter interview notes on the profile

The manager enters their interview note directly on the candidate profile, tags HR for notification. No more email back-and-forth. Customizable Kanban per stage.

4

Migration handled + OPCO training

Import from HubSpot, T4S, Excel handled. User training via OPCO (Qualiopi certification) — reimbursable for most French SMBs/mid-market.

Why Marvin

Marvin vs internal HR tools.

Without Marvin

  • HubSpot: powerful sales CRM, but « too generic » for recruitment.
  • Tool for Staffing (T4S): built for recruitment agencies, not for internal HR collaborative use.
  • Trello + Drive + Excel: low-cost but no pipeline, no visibility, no audit.

With Marvin

  • Differentiated license model: full HR + consultative managers. Respects SMB/mid-market budgets (5-8 people).
  • Built for internal collaboration: managers enter notes on the profile, HR has the overview.
  • Migration handled + OPCO Qualiopi training (reimbursable).

Currently using HubSpot / Tool for Staffing?

Many of our customers came from there. We'll show you how Marvin fits in — without breaking what works.

HubSpot too generic, poorly suited to recruitment specifics.

Asterigo — mid-market HR team EPM consulting, Marvin demo verbatim

See all case studies

Let's talk about your goals

30 minutes to understand your challenges and show you how Marvin can transform your day-to-day.